Southampton County, VA
The federal environmental record for Southampton County (population 17,975): what is on file, where it is, and what remains open. Sources and retrieval dates are on the methodology page.
0
Superfund NPL sites
1
federal cleanup sites
0
PFAS-detecting water systems
3
TRI facilities
1
open tank releases
Drinking water: PFAS testing
No public water system serving Southampton reported a PFAS detection in the UCMR5 national testing round. Systems serving under 3,300 people were only sampled in part, so absence from this table is not proof of absence in the water.
Facilities reporting toxic releases (2024)
3 facilities in Southampton filed TRI reports for 2024, totalling 20k lb released.
| Facility | City | Top chemicals | Total released |
|---|---|---|---|
| SOLENIS LLC | COURTLAND | Triethylamine, Hydrochloric acid (acid aerosols including mists, vapors, gas, fog, and other airborne forms of any particle size) | 13k lb |
| ARKEMA INC FRANKLIN PLANT | COURTLAND | tert-Butyl alcohol | 5k lb |
| ATLANTIC POLE & PILING - NEWSOMS | NEWSOMS | Arsenic And Arsenic Compounds, Chromium and Chromium Compounds(except for chromite ore mined in the Transvaal Region) | 2k lb |
Underground fuel tanks
EPA's UST Finder records 126 tank facilities in Southampton: 50 tanks in service and 304 closed. 27 fuel releases are on record, of which 1 remain open. Open releases are cleanups that have not reached "no further action".
Radon
EPA maps Southampton as Zone 3, the lowest predicted indoor radon (under 2 pCi/L average). Radon and air quality are covered in depth on lung.com.
The record for one specific address
County figures blur what matters: distance. The Address Environmental Report runs these same federal datasets against one address and reports every site, tank, polluter and water result around it, with distances, in about a minute.
Get the report - $39All federal cleanup sites on file
The wider Superfund enterprise inventory (SEMS) for Southampton, including sites assessed but never listed. Presence here records that EPA had reason to look, not a finding of danger.
- FRANKLIN ABANDONED CONTAINERFRANKLIN