Skip to content

States / Arkansas

Garland County, AR

The federal environmental record for Garland County (population 99,784): what is on file, where it is, and what remains open. Sources and retrieval dates are on the methodology page.

0

Superfund NPL sites

1

federal cleanup sites

0

PFAS-detecting water systems

5

TRI facilities

6

open tank releases

Drinking water: PFAS testing

No public water system serving Garland reported a PFAS detection in the UCMR5 national testing round. Systems serving under 3,300 people were only sampled in part, so absence from this table is not proof of absence in the water.

Facilities reporting toxic releases (2024)

5 facilities in Garland filed TRI reports for 2024, totalling 1.6M lb released.

FacilityCityTop chemicalsTotal released
US VANADIUM LLCHOT SPRINGSNickel And Nickel Compounds, Ammonia1.6M lb
RADIUS AEROSPACE INC. DBA RADIUS AEROSPACE-HOT SPRINGSHOT SPRINGSTetrachloroethylene, Nitrate compounds (water dissociable; reportable only when in aqueous solution)10k lb
ALLIANCE RUBBER COHOT SPRINGS NATIONAL PARKSodium nitrite, Zinc compounds7k lb
ALUMA-WELD INC. D/B/A XPRESS BOATSHOT SPRINGSDiisocyanates999 lb
TIMBER AUTOMATION LLCHOT SPRINGS NATIONAL PARKChromium, Nickel54 lb

Underground fuel tanks

EPA's UST Finder records 308 tank facilities in Garland: 187 tanks in service and 645 closed. 56 fuel releases are on record, of which 6 remain open. Open releases are cleanups that have not reached "no further action".

Radon

EPA maps Garland as Zone 2, moderate predicted indoor radon (2 to 4 pCi/L average). Radon and air quality are covered in depth on lung.com.

The record for one specific address

County figures blur what matters: distance. The Address Environmental Report runs these same federal datasets against one address and reports every site, tank, polluter and water result around it, with distances, in about a minute.

Get the report - $39

All federal cleanup sites on file

The wider Superfund enterprise inventory (SEMS) for Garland, including sites assessed but never listed. Presence here records that EPA had reason to look, not a finding of danger.

  • CEDAR OIL WORKSHOT SPRINGS